ABSTRACT
Introduction: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic killed over 6 million people worldwide. Children were described to have predominantly mild or asymptomatic infections and to be less exposed to the virus, at least for the initial variants. In the present study, we describe how SARS-CoV-2 can silently infect tonsils and adenoids in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy. Method(s): In this cross-sectional study we assessed children who underwent adenotonsillectomy between October 2020 and September 2021 in a secondary hospital in Brazil. All the caregivers denied any symptom of acute viral upper airway infection in the month prior to surgery. Briefly, nasal cytobrush (NC), nasal wash (NW) and tonsillar tissue fragments posttonsillectomy were tested by RT-PCR, immunohistochemistry (IHC), in situ immunofluorescence (IF), and flow cytometry. Result(s): A total of 48 children (18 females, median age 5.5 years) were enrolled. None of them had been vaccinated against COVID-19 at the time of surgery. Only 2 had a history of previous COVID-19 diagnosis, 3 and 5 months, respectively, before surgery. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in 25% (12) of patients-20% in palatine tonsils, 16.27% in the adenoids, 10.41% in NC, and 6.25% in NW. IHC labeling showed viral nucleoprotein presence in both adenoids and palatine tonsils, in epithelial surface and lymphoid cells from extrafollicular and follicular regions. In 5 out of 7 patients, in situ IF showed the expression of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and viral spike protein in the tonsillar tissue. Flow cytometry revealed that SARS-CoV-2 is predominantly observed in CD123+ dendritic cells (10.57% of all tested sites), followed by CD14+ monocytes (6.32%). Conclusion(s): According to these results, the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection seems to be higher than expected and underdiagnosed in children at this age group. Palatine tonsils and adenoids are important sites of infection and may be a reservoir for the virus. Nevertheless, it is still unclear the impact of these results on virus transmission.
ABSTRACT
Diabetes is associated with a worse prognosis and a high risk of morbidity and mortality in COVID-19 patients. We aimed to evaluate the main factors involved in the poor prognosis in diabetic patients. A total of 984 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 admitted to the hospital were included in this study. Patients were first divided into type-2 diabetic (DM+) and non-diabetic (DM-) groups. The participants were analyzed based on the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) and on the Quick-Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) to find the best prognostic risk score for our study. The DM+ and DM- groups were divided into non-severe and severe groups. Comparative and correlative analyses were used to identify the physiological parameters that could be employed for creating a potential risk indicator for DM+ COVID-19 patients. We found a poorer prognosis for the DM+ COVID-19 patients with a higher ICU admission rate, mechanical ventilation rate, vasopressor use, dialysis, and longer treatment times compared with the DM- group. DM+ COVID-19 patients had increased plasma glucose, lactate, age, urea, NEWS, and D-dimer levels, herein referred to as the GLAUND set, and worse prognosis and outcomes when compared with infected DM- patients. The NEWS score was a better indicator for assessing COVID-19 severity in diabetic patients than the q-SOFA score. In conclusion, diabetic COVID-19 patients should be assessed with the NEWS score and GLAUND set for determining their prognosis COVID-19 prognosis.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Sepsis , COVID-19/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Organ Dysfunction Scores , ROC Curve , Retrospective Studies , Sepsis/diagnosisABSTRACT
The coronavirus outbreak shows the critical importance of health and safety at work measures and working conditions in all sectors of activity, including the judicial system. The COVID-19 crisis put pressure on the Portuguese judicial system to implement new procedures and practices in a very short time, which severed and exposed some previous identified fragilities of the judiciary organization and management of the judicial system, with consequences in the working conditions of the judicial professionals. The main objective of this article is to analyse the response(s) to the coronavirus crisis concerning the working conditions in the Portuguese judicial system. The pursuit of this objective involved the collection and analysis of legislation and regulation and online news, opinion pieces and press releases from the judicial associations and public official institutions from February to June 2020 concerning the response to the COVID-19 pandemic in the judicial system. © 2021 The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.